The field of sustainable battery technologies is rapidly evolving, with significant progress in enhancing battery longevity, recycling efficiency, and the adoption of alternative components. This review highlights recent advancements in electrode materials, focusing on silicon anodes and sulfur cathodes. Silicon anodes improve capacity through lithiation and delithiation processes, while sulfur cathodes offer high energy density, despite inherent challenges. Recycling technologies are also advancing, with mechanical methods achieving 60% efficiency, hydrometallurgical processes reaching 75%, and pyrometallurgical methods achieving 85% efficiency. These improvements in recycling contribute to a more sustainable lifecycle for batteries. Moreover, the shift towards alternative components, such as organic batteries, sodium-ion batteries, and solid-state batteries, is gaining momentum, representing 10%, 20%, and 15% of the market, respectively. These alternatives address environmental concerns and enhance battery performance and reliability. These developments underscore the importance of ongoing innovation in electrode materials and recycling technologies to overcome current challenges. As the industry continues to evolve, these advancements pave the way for more efficient and environmentally friendly energy storage solutions, promising a sustainable future for battery technologies.
| Published in | American Journal of Applied Chemistry (Volume 12, Issue 4) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ajac.20241204.11 |
| Page(s) | 77-88 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Battery Recycling, Alternative Materials, Life Cycle Assessment, Circular Economy, Advanced Electrode Materials
| [1] | D. Marcin, M. Lacko, D. Bodnár, and L. Pancurák, “Capacitor-Based Active Cell Balancing for Electric Vehicle Battery Systems: Insights from Simulations,” Power Electron. Drives, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 317–330, 2024, |
| [2] | C. Zhang and Y. X. Tao, “Hypothalamic-pituitary-derived melanocortin axis links to myelopoiesis and immunotherapy,” Innovation, vol. 4, no. 4, p. 100453, 2023, |
| [3] | L. Silva-Rodriguez, A. Sanjab, E. Fumagalli, and M. Gibescu, “Light robust co-optimization of energy and reserves in the day-ahead electricity market,” Appl. Energy, vol. 353, no. PA, p. 121982, 2024, |
| [4] | H. Liu et al., “Inflammatory risk stratification individualizes anti-inflammatory pharmacotherapy for acute type A aortic dissection,” Innovation, vol. 4, no. 4, 2023, |
| [5] | F. Pollozhani, R. S. McLeod, C. Schwarzbauer, and C. J. Hopfe, “Assessing school ventilation strategies from the perspective of health, environment, and energy,” Appl. Energy, vol. 353, no. PA, p. 121961, 2024, |
| [6] | D. Raabe, “The Materials Science behind Sustainable Metals and Alloys,” Chem. Rev., vol. 123, no. 5, pp. 2436–2608, 2023, |
| [7] | X. Zai et al., “Precise modification of the surface charge of antigen enhances vaccine immunogenicity,” Innovation, vol. 4, no. 4, p. 100451, 2023, |
| [8] | Y. Gao et al., “Radiation effects on lithium metal batteries,” Innovation, vol. 4, no. 4, 2023, |
| [9] | U. De Lleida, M. Fowler, L. L. An, and A. Hauer, “EDITOR-IN-CHIEF Dirk Uwe Sauer Institute for Power Electronics and Electrical Drives (ISEA), Institute for Power Generation and Storage Systems (PGS), E. ON Energy Research Center, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany EDITORS Luisa Cabeza”, |
| [10] | T. Robben, C. Offermanns, H. Heimes, and A. Kampker, “Advancements in Battery Cell Finalization: Insights from an Expert Survey and Prospects for Process Optimization,” World Electr. Veh. J., vol. 15, no. 5, 2024, |
| [11] | J. H. Noh et al., “Wearable and Washable MnO2−Zn Battery Packaged by Vacuum Sealing,” Nanomaterials, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1–13, 2023, |
| [12] | G. Zhao, X. Wang, and M. Negnevitsky, “Connecting battery technologies for electric vehicles from battery materials to management,” iScience, vol. 25, no. 2, p. 103744, 2022, |
| [13] | W. Yao, Z. Zheng, J. Zhou, D. Liu, J. Song, and Y. Zhu, A Minireview of the Solid-State Electrolytes for Zinc Batteries, vol. 15, no. 20. 2023. |
| [14] | S. Jiang, T. Zhang, Y. Zhou, P. Lai, and Y. Huang, “Wearable ultrasound bioelectronics for healthcare monitoring,” Innovation, vol. 4, no. 4, p. 100447, 2023, |
| [15] | C. J. Torrente, J. Reca, R. López-Luque, J. Martínez, and F. J. Casares, “Simulation model to analyze the spatial distribution of solar radiation in agrivoltaic Mediterranean greenhouses and its effect on crop water needs,” Appl. Energy, vol. 353, no. September 2023, 2024, |
| [16] | L. Wang, C. Zhang, S. Fan, X. Mo, and X. Hu, “Treatment options for adult intermediate-risk AML patients in CR1: Allo-HSCT or chemotherapy?,” Innovation, vol. 4, no. 4, p. 100461, 2023, |
| [17] | S. Ghimire, R. C. Deo, D. Casillas-Pérez, and S. Salcedo-Sanz, “Two-step deep learning framework with error compensation technique for short-term, half-hourly electricity price forecasting,” Appl. Energy, vol. 353, no. PA, p. 122059, 2024, |
| [18] | M. Lagnoni, C. Scarpelli, G. Lutzemberger, and A. Bertei, “Critical comparison of equivalent circuit and physics-based models for lithium-ion batteries: A graphite/lithium-iron-phosphate case study,” J. Energy Storage, vol. 94, no. May, p. 112326, 2024, |
| [19] | Y. Kong, J. Yu, S. Ge, and X. Fan, “Novel insight into RNA modifications in tumor immunity: Promising targets to prevent tumor immune escape,” Innovation, vol. 4, no. 4, p. 100452, 2023, |
| [20] | J. Loprete, R. Trojanowski, T. Butcher, J. Longtin, and D. Assanis, “Enabling residential heating decarbonization through hydronic low-temperature thermal distribution using forced-air assistive devices,” Appl. Energy, vol. 353, no. PA, p. 122031, 2024, |
| [21] | H. Li et al., “Physical regulation of copper catalyst with a hydrophobic promoter for enhancing CO2 hydrogenation to methanol,” Innovation, vol. 4, no. 4, p. 100445, 2023, |
| [22] | Y. Wang et al., “Impact of Individual Cell Parameter Difference on the Performance of Series-Parallel Battery Packs,” ACS Omega, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 10512–10524, 2023, |
| [23] | M. Ye and D. F. Zhang, “Understanding and modeling human traits and diseases: Insights from the comparative genomics resources of Zoonomia,” Innovation, vol. 4, no. 4, p. 100444, 2023, |
| [24] | K. Yu, W. Chen, D. Deng, and Q. Wu, “Advancements in Battery Monitoring: Harnessing Fiber Grating Sensors for Enhanced Performance and Reliability,” Sensors, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 1–25, 2024, |
| [25] | D. Teng, X. Jia, W. Yang, L. An, G. Shen, and H. Zhang, “Experimental Investigation into Flue Gas Water and Waste Heat Recovery Using a Purge Gas Ceramic Membrane Condenser,” ACS Omega, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 4956–4969, 2022, |
| [26] | A. Afzal, R. K. Abdul Razak, A. D. Mohammed Samee, R. Kumar, Ü. Ağbulut, and S. G. Park, A critical review on renewable battery thermal management system using heat pipes, vol. 148, no. 16. Springer International Publishing, 2023. |
| [27] | H. Fayaz et al., Optimization of Thermal and Structural Design in Lithium-Ion Batteries to Obtain Energy Efficient Battery Thermal Management System (BTMS): A Critical Review, vol. 29, no. 1. Springer Netherlands, 2022. |
| [28] | T. Wei, X. Xiaoming, D. Hua, G. Yaohua, L. Jicheng, and W. Hongchao, “Sensitivity Analysis of the Battery Thermal Management System with a Reciprocating Cooling Strategy Combined with a Flat Heat Pipe,” ACS Omega, vol. 5, no. 14, pp. 8258–8267, 2020, |
| [29] | S. Huang, C. He, J. Li, Y. Z. Gao, Z. Wang, and Y. Wei, “Emerging paradigms in exploring the interactions among diet, probiotics, and cancer immunotherapeutic response,” Innovation, vol. 4, no. 4, p. 100456, 2023, |
| [30] | M. Jin et al., “Adaptive evolution to the natural and anthropogenic environment in a global invasive crop pest, the cotton bollworm,” Innovation, vol. 4, no. 4, 2023, |
| [31] | H. Bao, P. Knights, M. Kizil, and M. Nehring, “Energy Consumption and Battery Size of Battery Trolley Electric Trucks in Surface Mines,” Energies, vol. 17, no. 6, 2024, |
| [32] | W. Liu, X. Li, Y. Zhao, L. Wu, and S. Hong, “Study on the effect of fluorinated solvent electrolyte on the active material and cycle performance of a commercial 21700-type battery,” RSC Adv., vol. 13, no. 29, pp. 20271–20281, 2023, |
| [33] | H. Zhang, Y. Zhang, L. Huang, J. Song, and Z. Huang, “Study on the Influence of Connection Structure between Batteries on Battery Pack Performance,” Electron., vol. 13, no. 5, 2024, |
| [34] | J. Zhong, J. Shi, and L. T. Amundadottir, “Artificial intelligence and improved early detection for pancreatic cancer,” Innovation, vol. 4, no. 4, p. 100457, 2023, |
| [35] | F. Liu, K. Chen, and D. Xue, “How to fast grow large-size crystals?,” Innovation, vol. 4, no. 4, p. 100458, 2023, |
| [36] | S. Chen et al., “All-temperature area battery application mechanism, performance, and strategies,” Innovation, vol. 4, no. 4, p. 100465, 2023, |
| [37] | H. Liu, L. Zhang, Q. Ma, W. Zhao, and Y. Chen, “From tree to forest: Multiple carbon sink constraints,” Innovation, vol. 4, no. 4, p. 100463, 2023, |
| [38] | T. Huang and Y. Li, “Current progress, challenges, and future perspectives of language models for protein representation and protein design,” Innovation, vol. 4, no. 4, p. 100446, 2023, |
| [39] | H. L. Qiu et al., “Global burden and drivers of hyperglycemia: Estimates and predictions from 1990 to 2050,” Innovation, vol. 4, no. 4, p. 100450, 2023, |
| [40] | A. Li et al., “Genome architecture and selective signals compensatorily shape plastic response to a new environment,” Innovation, vol. 4, no. 4, 2023, |
| [41] | Y. He and Y. Mao, “Exploring the primate genome: Unraveling the mysteries of evolution and human disease,” Innovation, vol. 4, no. 4, p. 100467, 2023, |
| [42] | A. N. Patel et al., “Lithium-ion battery second life: pathways, challenges and outlook,” Front. Chem., vol. 12, no. April, pp. 1–21, 2024, |
| [43] | Y. Tang et al., “Flexible all-organic photodetectors via universal water-assisted transfer printing,” Innovation, vol. 4, no. 4, p. 100460, 2023, |
| [44] | B. Yang et al., “Need of a paradigm shift to conserve endangered species in China’s national park system,” Innovation, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 9–10, 2023, |
| [45] | H. Le, Z. Rong, and Y. Wei, “Exploring the universe and protecting the Earth: Young Chinese scientists in action,” Innov., vol. 4, no. 4, p. 100466, 2023, |
| [46] | T. Lombardo et al., “Artificial Intelligence Applied to Battery Research: Hype or Reality?,” Chem. Rev., vol. 122, no. 12, pp. 10899–10969, 2022, |
| [47] | N. Shamim et al., “Investigation of Fe-Ni Battery/Module for Grid Service Duty Cycles,” Materials (Basel)., vol. 17, no. 12, 2024, |
| [48] | Y. Xia, H. Chen, and X. Chen, “Integrating social neuroscience into human-machine mutual behavioral understanding for autonomous driving,” Innovation, vol. 4, no. 4, p. 100455, 2023, |
| [49] | P. Benalcazar, A. Komorowska, and J. Kamiński, “A GIS-based method for assessing the economics of utility-scale photovoltaic systems,” Appl. Energy, vol. 353, no. August 2023, 2024, |
| [50] | J. G. Ordoñez, J. Barco-Jiménez, A. Pantoja, J. Revelo-Fuelagán, and J. E. Candelo-Becerra, “Comprehensive analysis of MPC-based energy management strategies for isolated microgrids empowered by storage units and renewable energy sources,” J. Energy Storage, vol. 94, no. May, p. 112127, 2024, |
| [51] | M. Vesterlund, S. Borisová, and E. Emilsson, “Data center excess heat for mealworm farming, an applied analysis for sustainable protein production,” Appl. Energy, vol. 353, no. March 2022, 2024, |
| [52] | R. D. Selvakumar and A. K. Alkaabi, “Design and performance evaluation of a novel electrohydrodynamically enhanced PCM heat sink,” J. Energy Storage, vol. 94, no. May, 2024, |
| [53] | M. Yin, H. Cai, A. Gattiglio, F. Khayatian, R. S. Smith, and P. Heer, “Data-driven predictive control for demand side management: Theoretical and experimental results,” Appl. Energy, vol. 353, no. PA, p. 122101, 2024, |
| [54] | I. Mariuzzo, B. Fina, S. Stroemer, and M. Raugi, “Economic assessment of multiple energy community participation,” Appl. Energy, vol. 353, no. August 2023, 2024, |
| [55] | A. R. Mainar, E. Iruin, I. Urdampilleta, H. J. Grande, and J. A. Blázquez, “Effect of cell design on the durability of secondary zinc-air batteries,” Appl. Energy, vol. 353, no. September 2023, 2024, |
| [56] | T. Krause, D. Nusko, L. Pitta Bauermann, M. Vetter, M. Schäfer, and C. Holly, “Methods for Quantifying Expansion in Lithium-Ion Battery Cells Resulting from Cycling: A Review,” Energies, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 1–39, 2024, |
| [57] | E. Ruokamo et al., “Estimating the economic value of hydropeaking externalities in regulated rivers,” Appl. Energy, vol. 353, no. PA, p. 122055, 2024, |
| [58] | C. Özyalcin, S. Sterlepper, S. Roiser, H. Eichlseder, and S. Pischinger, “Exhaust gas aftertreatment to minimize NOX emissions from hydrogen-fueled internal combustion engines,” Appl. Energy, vol. 353, no. X, 2024, |
| [59] | M. Lecompte et al., “Experimental assessment of high-energy high nickel-content NMC lithium-ion battery cycle life at cold temperatures,” J. Energy Storage, vol. 94, no. May, pp. 0–7, 2024, |
| [60] | L. B. Inhestern, D. Peitsch, and G. Paniagua, “Flow irreversibility and heat transfer effects on turbine efficiency,” Appl. Energy, vol. 353, no. PA, p. 122077, 2024, |
| [61] | E. Genov, C. De Cauwer, G. Van Kriekinge, T. Coosemans, and M. Messagie, “Forecasting flexibility of charging of electric vehicles: Tree and cluster-based methods,” Appl. Energy, vol. 353, no. PA, p. 121969, 2024, |
| [62] | C. van Zyl, X. Ye, and R. Naidoo, “Harnessing eXplainable artificial intelligence for feature selection in time series energy forecasting: A comparative analysis of Grad-CAM and SHAP,” Appl. Energy, vol. 353, no. PA, p. 122079, 2024, |
| [63] | E. Arinaitwe, M. McNamee, and M. Försth, “Is the fire performance of phase change materials a significant barrier to implementation in building applications?,” J. Energy Storage, vol. 94, no. February, 2024, |
| [64] | F. Román, Z. Munir, and O. Hensel, “Mathematical modelling of a latent heat storage: Influence of PCM thermal conductivity and enthalpy-temperature relationship,” J. Energy Storage, vol. 94, no. February, 2024, |
| [65] | P. A. Prieto-Díaz, A. A. Maurice, and M. Vera, “Measuring density and viscosity of vanadium electrolytes: A database with multivariate polynomial fits,” J. Energy Storage, vol. 94, no. March, p. 112429, 2024, |
| [66] | L. V. De Luca Peña et al., “Monetized (socio-) environmental handprint and footprint of an offshore windfarm in the Belgian Continental Shelf: An assessment of local, regional and global impacts,” Appl. Energy, vol. 353, no. September 2023, 2024, |
| [67] | N. Lukač, D. Mongus, B. Žalik, G. Štumberger, and M. Bizjak, “Novel GPU-accelerated high-resolution solar potential estimation in urban areas by using a modified diffuse irradiance model,” Appl. Energy, vol. 353, no. PA, p. 122129, 2024, |
| [68] | R. Kothari, A. La Seta, C. S. Hemmingsen, N. B. Desai, and F. Haglind, “Numerical analysis of measures to minimize the thermal instability in high temperature packed-beds for thermal energy storage systems,” J. Energy Storage, vol. 94, no. March, p. 112431, 2024, |
| [69] | V. Sovljanski and M. Paolone, “On the use of Cramér-Rao Lower Bound for least-variance circuit parameters identification of Li-ion cells,” J. Energy Storage, vol. 94, no. October 2023, p. 112223, 2024, |
| [70] | G. M. Binini, J. L. Munda, and O. M. Popoola, “Optimal location, sizing and scheduling of distributed energy storage in a radial distribution network,” J. Energy Storage, vol. 94, no. November 2023, p. 112499, 2024, |
| [71] | D. Cremoncini et al., “Optimal participation of a wind and hybrid battery storage system in the day-ahead and automatic frequency restoration reserve markets,” J. Energy Storage, vol. 94, no. May, p. 112309, 2024, |
| [72] | M. Chen, C. Batlle, B. Escachx, R. Costa-Castelló, and J. Na, “Sensitivity analysis and calibration for a two-dimensional state-space model of metal hydride storage tanks based on experimental data,” J. Energy Storage, vol. 94, no. March, p. 112316, 2024, |
| [73] | G. Pintér, “The development of global power-to-methane potentials between 2000 and 2020: A comparative overview of international projects,” Appl. Energy, vol. 353, no. August 2023, 2024, |
| [74] | Y. Song, M. Bulla, H. Patanwala, and E. Sahraei, “Validation of Sahraei Failure Criterion on cylindrical and pouch Lithium-ion battery cells,” J. Energy Storage, vol. 94, no. May, p. 112371, 2024, |
| [75] | A. M. Syré, P. Shyposha, L. Freisem, A. Pollak, and D. Göhlich, “Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Battery and Fuel Cell Electric Cars, Trucks, and Buses,” World Electr. Veh. J., vol. 15, no. 3, 2024, |
| [76] | Y. He et al., “Editorial Board,” Appl. Energy, vol. 353, p. 122293, 2024, |
APA Style
Hailemariam, T. T., Birkneh, T. S. (2024). Advances in Sustainable Battery Technologies: Enhancing Longevity, Recycling, and Alternative Components-- A Review. American Journal of Applied Chemistry, 12(4), 77-88. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajac.20241204.11
ACS Style
Hailemariam, T. T.; Birkneh, T. S. Advances in Sustainable Battery Technologies: Enhancing Longevity, Recycling, and Alternative Components-- A Review. Am. J. Appl. Chem. 2024, 12(4), 77-88. doi: 10.11648/j.ajac.20241204.11
AMA Style
Hailemariam TT, Birkneh TS. Advances in Sustainable Battery Technologies: Enhancing Longevity, Recycling, and Alternative Components-- A Review. Am J Appl Chem. 2024;12(4):77-88. doi: 10.11648/j.ajac.20241204.11
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ajac.20241204.11,
author = {Tsiye Tekleyohanis Hailemariam and Tekletsadik Sheworke Birkneh},
title = {Advances in Sustainable Battery Technologies: Enhancing Longevity, Recycling, and Alternative Components-- A Review
},
journal = {American Journal of Applied Chemistry},
volume = {12},
number = {4},
pages = {77-88},
doi = {10.11648/j.ajac.20241204.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajac.20241204.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajac.20241204.11},
abstract = {The field of sustainable battery technologies is rapidly evolving, with significant progress in enhancing battery longevity, recycling efficiency, and the adoption of alternative components. This review highlights recent advancements in electrode materials, focusing on silicon anodes and sulfur cathodes. Silicon anodes improve capacity through lithiation and delithiation processes, while sulfur cathodes offer high energy density, despite inherent challenges. Recycling technologies are also advancing, with mechanical methods achieving 60% efficiency, hydrometallurgical processes reaching 75%, and pyrometallurgical methods achieving 85% efficiency. These improvements in recycling contribute to a more sustainable lifecycle for batteries. Moreover, the shift towards alternative components, such as organic batteries, sodium-ion batteries, and solid-state batteries, is gaining momentum, representing 10%, 20%, and 15% of the market, respectively. These alternatives address environmental concerns and enhance battery performance and reliability. These developments underscore the importance of ongoing innovation in electrode materials and recycling technologies to overcome current challenges. As the industry continues to evolve, these advancements pave the way for more efficient and environmentally friendly energy storage solutions, promising a sustainable future for battery technologies.
},
year = {2024}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Advances in Sustainable Battery Technologies: Enhancing Longevity, Recycling, and Alternative Components-- A Review AU - Tsiye Tekleyohanis Hailemariam AU - Tekletsadik Sheworke Birkneh Y1 - 2024/08/27 PY - 2024 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajac.20241204.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ajac.20241204.11 T2 - American Journal of Applied Chemistry JF - American Journal of Applied Chemistry JO - American Journal of Applied Chemistry SP - 77 EP - 88 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-8745 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajac.20241204.11 AB - The field of sustainable battery technologies is rapidly evolving, with significant progress in enhancing battery longevity, recycling efficiency, and the adoption of alternative components. This review highlights recent advancements in electrode materials, focusing on silicon anodes and sulfur cathodes. Silicon anodes improve capacity through lithiation and delithiation processes, while sulfur cathodes offer high energy density, despite inherent challenges. Recycling technologies are also advancing, with mechanical methods achieving 60% efficiency, hydrometallurgical processes reaching 75%, and pyrometallurgical methods achieving 85% efficiency. These improvements in recycling contribute to a more sustainable lifecycle for batteries. Moreover, the shift towards alternative components, such as organic batteries, sodium-ion batteries, and solid-state batteries, is gaining momentum, representing 10%, 20%, and 15% of the market, respectively. These alternatives address environmental concerns and enhance battery performance and reliability. These developments underscore the importance of ongoing innovation in electrode materials and recycling technologies to overcome current challenges. As the industry continues to evolve, these advancements pave the way for more efficient and environmentally friendly energy storage solutions, promising a sustainable future for battery technologies. VL - 12 IS - 4 ER -
Chemical Engineering, Debre Berhan University, Debre Berhan, Ethiopia
Mechanical Engineering, Debre Berhan University, Debre Berhan, Ethiopia
